appreciation - a taxable-account feature, not an IRA one
Correction after user pushback. The earlier note "ROC does not help
the taxable case - the deferral replicates the IRA" was WRONG: a
traditional IRA defers to the ORDINARY rate at withdrawal, while ROC
in a taxable account defers to the LTCG rate on a >1y sale (the
distribution is basis-reducing and reappears inside the shareholder's
own capital gain). Under the premise LTCG rate < future ordinary
rate, ROC - like NAV appreciation - favors the taxable account.
Contrast ordinary income (interest, ordinary divs, STCG): taxed at
the ordinary rate in BOTH accounts, so only the IRA's deferral wins.
taxplan.py:
- _deferred_share(): per fund, share of 5y total return that defers
to the investor = (NAV change + ROC) / total return, from the
parsed per-share N-CSR table, max'd with the taxsplit appreciation
share.
- >= 50% deferred -> location "TAXABLE (defers to LTCG)" (renamed
from "TAXABLE (accrues)"); 10-50% ROC in distributions -> note.
- Merger-arb cap 0.35 -> 0.50: HMEZX's per-share table (52% NII /
30% gains / 18% ROC over 5y) refutes "mostly STCG" - HMEZX/MERVX
are now MIXED (check 1099), not clean IRA.
- RESEARCH.md: corrected placement write-up, incl. the distinction
between the tax question and the fund-quality question (heavy ROC
can mean principal erosion - PGSIX NAV -34%/5y - which affects
selection, not the optimal account).
App: order dict + filter updated to the new location name.
Tests: merger-arb expectation updated to MIXED; 2 new checks for
the ROC upgrade/note logic. 99/99 fundlab + 32/32 app.
Greg Pomerantz
895efc9bff